Answer:  Creationists talk about the sciences as being a discipline of Observational evidences as distinguished from historical evidences that cannot be tested in the laboratory and one-time only events in the past that likewise cannot be tested. But what about evidences that the Bible refers to?  In particular, Biblical students  quote Psalm 19 as noting that something can be examined by science as well as theologians. Ps. 19 says that things are going on in real time that can actually be examined and measured.  It  is specifically expressed that the evidence is not actual speech or words, but is nonetheless information that is being transmitted across the world and the whole Universe as well.  Not only that, but there is evidence, the Psalm says,  that the Sun is to be found in the space time continuum of a structure in space of some kind that astronomers have already referred to as the basic fabric of the Universe and is actually expanding. Then there is the statement that the Sun moves in a circuit relative to the perspective of an earth dweller.  

Now here is the answer to the previous question: Where was the Sun born?  The starting premise for astronomers struggling with this question is that the Solar System is 4.6 Billion years old and has taken 27 rotations around the Milky Way galaxy.  It is also assumed that the Sun was born in a giant molecular cloud that no longer exists; and that it must have been in the M67 Cluster, because the assumptions match that environment.  The Sun had to be born in a benign environment with relatively few stars nearby. There are about 6 popular theories on how the solar system formed with the chemical makeup that it has.   None of them have any evidences to show.  Finding the sister stars that formed at the same time is said to be daunting.  M67 was also chosen as the birth place because the stars are similar to our Sun.  Even if M67 is not the birth place, a study of it should help us determine the origins of the Sun.  The bottom line seems to be that a consensus is needed, since evidence is not evident.  In other words, astronomers still have no clue.