<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creation Science &#187; Apologetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creationsciencenm.org/tag/apologetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creationsciencenm.org</link>
	<description>Fellowship of New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Evidences that the earth and Universe is relatively young.</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/evidences-that-the-earth-and-universe-is-relatively-young/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/evidences-that-the-earth-and-universe-is-relatively-young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[101]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Earth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following file lists evidences for a young earth in the time span of 6000 years to perhaps 10,000 years maximum, by Don Batton, 2009.  This is more support for the presentations made by Creationists Humphreys and Hardin.  See their presentations herein this web site. Age of the earth &#8211; 101 Evidences for a Young [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following file lists evidences for a young earth in the time span of 6000 years to perhaps 10,000 years maximum, by Don Batton, 2009.  This is more support for the presentations made by Creationists Humphreys and Hardin.  See their presentations herein this web site.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Age-of-the-earth-101-Evidences-for-a-Young-Earth-2.doc">Age of the earth &#8211; 101 Evidences for a Young Earth -2</a>  Format is MS WORD Office-2003 (*.doc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/evidences-that-the-earth-and-universe-is-relatively-young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apologetics on does it matter if the earth is very old?</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/apologetics-on-does-it-matter-if-the-earth-is-very-old/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/apologetics-on-does-it-matter-if-the-earth-is-very-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Earth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following MS PowerPoint presentation was given on March 20, 2012 on the subject of &#8220;Does the Bible allow for the Option of an Old Earth (~4.5 Billion Years Old) and an Old Universe (~ 14.6 Billion Years Old)?   And Does It Really Matter?   Authority of the Word of God:  2 Timothy 3:16; Romans 15:4; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following MS PowerPoint presentation was given on March 20, 2012 on the subject of &#8220;<strong>Does the Bible allow for the Option of an Old Earth (~4.5 Billion Years Old) and an Old Universe (~ 14.6 Billion Years Old)?   And Does It Really Matter?   Authority of the Word of God:  </strong>2 Timothy 3:16; Romans 15:4; 2 Peter 1:20-21; Proverbs 30:5-6;   Numbers 12:5-8;  John 3:12.  The presentation was made by T. Hardin, a Creation scientist in the Albuquerque area.  See also articles on &#8220;<span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>Evidences</strong></span>&#8221; for a young earth and Universe on this web site.  This Powerpoint file references the &#8220;Evidences&#8221;, so you may want to download that file also.</p>
<p>The format is (*.pptx) MS Office-2007 This file is 45 MB in size and will take a few minutes to download. Please allow about 3-4 minutes or so, depending on your Computer/Internet speed.  A summary page in MS WORD format is also provided below.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2012.04.09-BibleAllowAnOldEarthCompact.pptx">2012.04.09 BibleAllowAnOldEarth(Compact)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2012.03.17-Bible-allow-an-Old-Earth-Handout.doc">2012.03.17 Bible allow an Old Earth &#8211; Handout</a></p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CSFNMMarchPresentation.mp3">CSFNMMarchPresentation</a>   Audio file, also a long download. (MP3 format)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/apologetics-on-does-it-matter-if-the-earth-is-very-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CSFNMMarchPresentation.mp3" length="35982366" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Scientist looks at the Universe</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dawkins and purpose The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dawkins-and-purpose.docx">Dawkins and purpose <br /></a>The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM say that everything that we look at has design, purpose and meaning.  If we don&#8217;t see it, it is not that it isn&#8217;t there; we simply lack knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Scientist-looks-at-Universe1.docx">Scientist looks at Universe</a> (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)</p>
<p>A Scientist (and a Physicist/Mathematician) looks at the Universe and applies the Scientific Method and Logic to explain what we see all around us.  We see everything headed towards becoming cold, dark and dead.  Is there any scientific explanation for the Universe starting out Operational and then going dead?  (By Jim Hovis, scientist, engineer, educator, retired)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presentation of Evidences for Existence of God</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Hardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcendental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod 2011.02.15  MS PowerPoint Format, Office-2007 (*.pptx).  A presentation by Terry Hardin regarding arguments for the existence of God from a number of different aspects of logic, apologetics, and experience.  A look at various areas of scientific and experiential disciplines to explain the Universe and the Origin and Creator of this Universe. This file may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod-2011.02.15.pptx">EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod 2011.02.15</a>  MS PowerPoint Format, Office-2007 (*.pptx).  A presentation by Terry Hardin regarding arguments for the existence of God from a number of different aspects of logic, apologetics, and experience.  A look at various areas of scientific and experiential disciplines to explain the Universe and the Origin and Creator of this Universe.</p>
<p><strong><em>This file may take a minute to download, please be patient.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review, Genesis in Space and Time, Francis Schaeffer</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godly Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schaeffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ungodly race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book Review Shaeffer Format is MS WORD, Office-2003 (*.doc) This is a review of Dr. Francis Schaeffer&#8217;s book, Genesis in Space and Time, IVP, 1972. This is a look at what Creation Science thinking was, leading up to 1972.  Dr. Schaeffer has a good grasp of what the implications of Science were in understanding the beginning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Shaeffer.docx">Book Review Shaeffer</a> Format is MS WORD, Office-2003 (*.doc) This is a review of Dr. Francis Schaeffer&#8217;s book, Genesis in Space and Time, IVP, 1972. This is a look at what Creation Science thinking was, leading up to 1972.  Dr. Schaeffer has a good grasp of what the implications of Science were in understanding the beginning of the Universe and mankind, including the events that lead to the Flood of Noah and related history.  (<em>Reviewed by Jim Hovis</em>. <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approved</strong></span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Articles on Nephilim, Gods, &amp; Giants</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leupold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Genesis 6  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003 Genesis 6  Format MS WORD (*.docx) Office -2007.  A discussion concerning Creation, conditions with man before the Flood of Noah, sons of God marrying the daughters of men, and who are the Nephilim? (By Jim Hovis) Genesis_6_paper_jenkins Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003 Genesis_6_paper_jenkins  Format MS WORD (*.docx) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis-61.doc">Genesis 6</a>  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis-63.docx">Genesis 6</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx) Office -2007.  A discussion concerning Creation, conditions with man before the Flood of Noah, sons of God marrying the daughters of men, and who are the Nephilim? (By Jim Hovis)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis_6_paper_jenkins.doc">Genesis_6_paper_jenkins</a> Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis_6_paper_jenkins.docx">Genesis_6_paper_jenkins</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx) A student analysis paper addressing Genesis 6 and the sons of God and the Nephilim. (By Levi Jenkins)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Leupold.doc">Book Review Leupold</a> Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Leupold.docx">Book Review Leupold</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx)  A Book Review of a work produced by Dr. Leupold in 1942. Discussion limited to Genesis 1 and 6; the Creation and the Sons of God and the Nephilim.  A good conservative view in late 19th Century and early 20th Century. (Reviewed by Jim Hovis-<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>approved</strong></span>)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Epp.doc">Book Review Epp</a>  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003. A Book Review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221;, by Theodore Epp, 1972.  Discussion limited to Genesis 1 to 6 that covers Creation day 1-4 and the issue of Sons of God and the Nephilim. (Reviewd by Jim Hovis) (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physics of the Rainbow &amp; its Meaning</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/physics-of-the-rainbow-its-meaning/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/physics-of-the-rainbow-its-meaning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Setterfield]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rainbow  Format is MS WORD (*.docx)  A discussion of how the rainbow might have come to be.  Physical and theology wise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Rainbow.docx">Rainbow</a>  Format is MS WORD (*.docx)  A discussion of how the rainbow might have come to be.  Physical and theology wise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/physics-of-the-rainbow-its-meaning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review, Discerning Truth, Jason Lisle</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/11/book-review-discerning-truth-jason-lisle/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/11/book-review-discerning-truth-jason-lisle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad hominem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallacies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book Review Discerning Truth  Office 2000 MS WORD format (*.doc) Jason Lisle&#8217;s new book reviewed by Jim Hovis (Approved)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Book-Review-Discerning-Truth.doc">Book Review Discerning Truth</a>  Office 2000 MS WORD format (*.doc)</p>
<p>Jason Lisle&#8217;s new book reviewed by Jim Hovis (<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approved</strong></span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/11/book-review-discerning-truth-jason-lisle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

