<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creation Science &#187; Astronomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creationsciencenm.org/tag/astronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creationsciencenm.org</link>
	<description>Fellowship of New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Science and Supposition in Evolution, Astronomy</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/science-and-supposition-in-evolution-astronomy/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/science-and-supposition-in-evolution-astronomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age of the Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sommer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A FEW THOUGHTS ABOUT &#8220;SCIENCE AND SUPPOSITION&#8221; (A Booklet written around the time of the Scopes &#8220;monkey&#8221; Trial.) D. A. Sommer&#8217;s booklet &#8220;Science and Supposition in Evolution Geology and Astronomy&#8221; was forwarded to me by my daughter in Illinois. It is yellowed with age, but its actual age is not given. The author was I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A FEW THOUGHTS ABOUT &#8220;SCIENCE AND SUPPOSITION&#8221; (A Booklet written around the time of the Scopes &#8220;monkey&#8221; Trial.)<br /></strong></p>
<p>D. A. Sommer&#8217;s booklet &#8220;Science and Supposition in Evolution Geology and Astronomy&#8221; was forwarded to me by my daughter in Illinois. It is yellowed with age, but its actual age is not given. The author was I think one of two preachers named Daniel Sommer in the restoration movement. Both seem to have been called D. A. Sommer, and would have been active in the 1920’s. Meager information about them is found on the website <a href="http://www.therestorationmovement.com/">www.therestorationmovement.com</a>. The biographical essay on the older Sommer leaves off description of his work from the late 1890’s to his 1940 death, Claiming that that information is readily available. (!) Please forward anything you may know or find about D. A. Sommer, Apostolic Review, or this booklet to the CSFNM library.</p>
<p>The document shows no publication date. The publisher is given on the first page; Apostolic Review, Indianapolis, Ind., 904 Udell Street. So, how old is it? The booklet begins with a list of &#8220;Six Indictments against the Theory of Evolution&#8221;. The sixth indictment speaks of &#8220;the World War&#8221;. The reference in the singular suggests that World War II was yet to occur.  On page 5 is a quote from Thomas Edison. It is taken from the N. Y. Herald, the December 31, 1879 issue, and described as being more than forty years old.  &#8220;More than forty years&#8221;? That would imply probably between 40 and 45. The quote, published barely before 1880, 40 to 45 years later puts the writing of the booklet at 1920 to 1925. It was printed in Indiana. I would be surprised if these booklets were not distributed at the Scopes Monkey trial.</p>
<p>Character of the booklet</p>
<p>This booklet is a very well-referenced critique of Evolution and the general effect of secularist, uniformitarian thinking on science and society as a whole. As I mentioned, the booklet indicts evolutionary thinking as a major cause of the (First) World War. The author makes a pretty good case in a short space, referencing Nietzsche especially. A reader who is moderately aware of developments over the last 90 years or so will notice some things which have changed. I was surprised to read a quote from Darwin&#8217;s discussion of &#8220;Imperfection of the Geological Record&#8221; which places the Silurian period as containing the oldest known fossils. Later in the text the terms Eozoic and Azoic are referred to in connection with &#8220;older&#8221; rocks that some thought had earlier fossils. (Azoic was the term used by the ones denying the erstwhile fossils) I wondered when the Cambrian and Ordovician were added to the geologic column.  The analysis reads very much like the creationist evangelist literature of today. Few of the arguments have lost strength with passage of time.</p>
<p>This document is solid proof that the opposition to evolution at the time of the Scopes trial was not just ranting from ignorant Bible-thumpers who could not read the first page of a scholarly work. Whether Sommer was a scientist I don’t know, but he had a better grasp of the science of his time than many vociferous people today do.</p>
<p>Analysis by <em><strong>Allen Johnson</strong></em>, March 2012.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>A PDF file of the booklet by D.A. Sommer circa 1920: (Click on below, allow a few minutes to download; 48 MB size.)<br /></strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Science-and-Supposition.pdf">Science and Supposition</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/03/science-and-supposition-in-evolution-astronomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Review Report, Astronomy (Psarris)</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Origins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psarris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astronomy video (In MS Office-2007 document Format: *.docx) A review of the Spike Psarris video titled, &#8220;Astronomy, Our Created Solar System&#8221;.  Available through www.creationastronomy.com Produced in 2009 Creation Astronomy Media.  The video is a discussion of how the solar system formed according to the theory of evolution and compared to the actual characteristics of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Astronomy-video1.docx">Astronomy video</a></p>
<p>(In MS Office-2007 document Format: *.docx) A review of the Spike Psarris video titled, &#8220;Astronomy, Our Created Solar System&#8221;.  Available through www.creationastronomy.com</p>
<p>Produced in 2009 Creation Astronomy Media.  The video is a discussion of how the solar system formed according to the theory of evolution and compared to the actual characteristics of our system. Reviewed by Jim Hovis (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presentation on Worldviews and their affects on Science</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/06/presentation-on-worldviews-and-their-affects-on-science/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/06/presentation-on-worldviews-and-their-affects-on-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center of Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humphreys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powderly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Big_Bad_theology_and_science_debates Title of Presentation, June 21, 2011:  “Big Bad Theology and Science Debates; Unconscious Worldview Assumptions as Spiritual &#38; Scientific Land Mines”  (Format is *.pptx, Office 2007) (This file and the three following are 4-6 MB in size and may take a minute or two to download) By Kent.G. Powderly Jr. Summary: Since both worldviews, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Big_Bad_theology_and_science_debates.pptx">Big_Bad_theology_and_science_debates</a></p>
<p><strong>Title of Presentation, June 21, 2011:  “Big Bad Theology and Science Debates; Unconscious Worldview Assumptions as Spiritual &amp; Scientific Land Mines”  (Format is *.pptx, Office 2007) (</strong><em>This file and the three following are 4-6 MB in size and may take a minute or two to download</em><strong>)</strong></p>
<p><strong>By</strong> <em>Kent.G. Powderly Jr.</em> <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Summary:</strong> Since both worldviews, Evolution and Creation science, have their own bias, the question isn’t really about religion vs. science then, it is about absolute truth. An ideology works structurally in the idea realm just like a religious dogma. We need to examine some of the ideologies of Greek and Roman to understand to some degree how we got to this point in the 21<sup>st</sup> Century.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Breakdown_of_Knowing.pptx">Breakdown_of_Knowing</a></p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/How_Do_We_Know_in_pp.pptx">How_Do_We_Know_in_pp</a></p>
<p>This next presentation exposes “<strong>How a Faith-based Materialism Exploited Science”.</strong></p>
<p><strong>These slides contain a short synopsis of the worldviews of each of these scientists and philosophers: Aristotle, Copernicus, Galileo, Bacon, Epicurus, Voltaire, Pascal, Newton, Hume, Rousseau, Hegel, Lyell, Kierkegaard, and finally Darwin.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/The_Footprints_of_Nimrod_in_the_Ancient_World.pptx">The_Footprints_of_Nimrod_in_the_Ancient_World</a></p>
<p>This presentation is all about <strong>Nimrod</strong> (a builder, inventor, and hunter of men) and what the Bible and Archeology has to say about him and his attempts to rule in Mesopotamia.  It is an account of history, philosophy and the attempts of ancient man.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Feel free to copy them and use them for </strong></span><em><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">noncommercial educational purposes only</span>.</strong></span><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/06/presentation-on-worldviews-and-their-affects-on-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Review on Speed of Light</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Lisle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed of light]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measuring speed of light in MS WORD Format (*.docx) Office-2007 A compilation by Jim Hovis on the subject of the speed of light in outer space and its effect on observations in distant space and photon wavelength red shift interpretation and the quantization principle.  Is the speed of light variant in different areas of space and/or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Measuring-speed-of-light1.docx">Measuring speed of light</a> in MS WORD Format (*.docx) Office-2007</p>
<p>A compilation by Jim Hovis on the subject of the speed of light in outer space and its effect on observations in distant space and photon wavelength red shift interpretation and the quantization principle.  Is the speed of light variant in different areas of space and/or near to massive objects in the heavens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Critique: &#8220;SETI&#8221; Revival Effort</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth-like planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&T Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SETI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article Critique SETI  (WORD 2003 format, *.doc) The status of the new Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence; Sky &#38; Telescope Magazine, Nov. 2010.  Reviewed by Jim Hovis (Article rejected)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Article-Critique-SETI.doc">Article Critique SETI</a>  (WORD 2003 format, *.doc) The status of the new Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence; Sky &amp; Telescope Magazine, Nov. 2010.  Reviewed by Jim Hovis (<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Article rejected</strong></span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Review (News Media) &#8220;Earth-like planet found?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth-like planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life in space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star with planets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth-like planet out there  (Format is Office-2000 WORD *.doc.)  Reviewed by Jim Hovis. Did Astronomers actually find an earth-like planet out there that could support life? (Rejected)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Earth-like-planet-out-there.doc">Earth-like planet out there</a>  (Format is Office-2000 WORD *.doc.)  Reviewed by Jim Hovis. Did Astronomers actually find an earth-like planet out there that could support life? (<span style="color: #ff0000;">Rejected</span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Critique on &#8220;Time line of Evolution&#8221; (S&amp;T)</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/06/article-critique-on-time-line-of-evolution-st/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/06/article-critique-on-time-line-of-evolution-st/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hecht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky & Telescope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time line]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/06/article-critique-on-time-line-of-evolution-st/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolution of Earth S&#38;T 2010  Evaluated by Jim Hovis. (Sky &#38; Telescope magazine) (not approved)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Evolution-of-Earth-ST-20101.doc">Evolution of Earth S&amp;T 2010</a>  Evaluated by Jim Hovis. (Sky &amp; Telescope magazine) (not approved)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/06/article-critique-on-time-line-of-evolution-st/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Astronomy and Biblical Issues</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/03/astronomy-and-biblical-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/03/astronomy-and-biblical-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 01:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March CSF1 (Office-2003, *.ppt format) March CSF (Office-2007, *.pptx format) A PowerPoint Presentation and discussion of the current Astronomy issues and what the Bible has to say.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/March-CSF1.ppt">March CSF1</a> (Office-2003, *.ppt format)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/March-CSF.pptx">March CSF</a> (Office-2007, *.pptx format)</p>
<p>A PowerPoint Presentation and discussion of the current Astronomy issues and what the Bible has to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/03/astronomy-and-biblical-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

