<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creation Science &#187; Cosmology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creationsciencenm.org/tag/cosmology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creationsciencenm.org</link>
	<description>Fellowship of New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A Scientist looks at the Universe</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dawkins and purpose The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dawkins-and-purpose.docx">Dawkins and purpose <br /></a>The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM say that everything that we look at has design, purpose and meaning.  If we don&#8217;t see it, it is not that it isn&#8217;t there; we simply lack knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Scientist-looks-at-Universe1.docx">Scientist looks at Universe</a> (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)</p>
<p>A Scientist (and a Physicist/Mathematician) looks at the Universe and applies the Scientific Method and Logic to explain what we see all around us.  We see everything headed towards becoming cold, dark and dead.  Is there any scientific explanation for the Universe starting out Operational and then going dead?  (By Jim Hovis, scientist, engineer, educator, retired)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two models of cosmology to consider</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clock rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space-time continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed of light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stretching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fabric of space 2 models  MS WORD Format Office-2007 (*.docx) This is a discussion of two models of the cosmos and the implication of the &#8220;expanse&#8221; stretched out, particularly on the 4th Day of the Creation Week.  It asks questions about the speed of light and interpretations of Red Shift of light energy.  This paper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Fabric-of-space-2-models.docx">Fabric of space 2 models</a>  MS WORD Format Office-2007 (*.docx)</p>
<p>This is a discussion of two models of the cosmos and the implication of the &#8220;expanse&#8221; stretched out, particularly on the 4th Day of the Creation Week.  It asks questions about the speed of light and interpretations of Red Shift of light energy.  This paper is intended to stimulate thinking.  It uses the concept of clock rate differences throughout the Universe discussed by folks such as Russ Humphreys and John Harnett.  Keep in mind that models are just that and no more.  Jim Hovis, amateur astronomer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presentation of Evidences for Existence of God</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creation Models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Existence of God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry Hardin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcendental]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod 2011.02.15  MS PowerPoint Format, Office-2007 (*.pptx).  A presentation by Terry Hardin regarding arguments for the existence of God from a number of different aspects of logic, apologetics, and experience.  A look at various areas of scientific and experiential disciplines to explain the Universe and the Origin and Creator of this Universe. This file may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod-2011.02.15.pptx">EvidencesForAthiestsShowTheExistenceOfGod 2011.02.15</a>  MS PowerPoint Format, Office-2007 (*.pptx).  A presentation by Terry Hardin regarding arguments for the existence of God from a number of different aspects of logic, apologetics, and experience.  A look at various areas of scientific and experiential disciplines to explain the Universe and the Origin and Creator of this Universe.</p>
<p><strong><em>This file may take a minute to download, please be patient.</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/presentation-of-evidences-for-existence-of-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review, The God of Creation by Epp</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God of Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book Review Epp  Format is MS WORD (*.docx) Office-2007.  This is a book review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221; by Theodore Epp, 1972, and reviewed by Jim Hovis.  It is a detailed presentation of Genesis 1-11 and the implications on Creation Science and Christian viewpoints. (Approved)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Epp.docx">Book Review Epp</a>  Format is MS WORD (*.docx) Office-2007.  This is a book review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221; by Theodore Epp, 1972, and reviewed by Jim Hovis.  It is a detailed presentation of Genesis 1-11 and the implications on Creation Science and Christian viewpoints. (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Critique: &#8220;SETI&#8221; Revival Effort</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth-like planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S&T Magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SETI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article Critique SETI  (WORD 2003 format, *.doc) The status of the new Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence; Sky &#38; Telescope Magazine, Nov. 2010.  Reviewed by Jim Hovis (Article rejected)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Article-Critique-SETI.doc">Article Critique SETI</a>  (WORD 2003 format, *.doc) The status of the new Search for Extraterrestial Intelligence; Sky &amp; Telescope Magazine, Nov. 2010.  Reviewed by Jim Hovis (<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Article rejected</strong></span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/10/article-critique-seti-revival-effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Review (News Media) &#8220;Earth-like planet found?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth-like planet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life in space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planet system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star with planets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earth-like planet out there  (Format is Office-2000 WORD *.doc.)  Reviewed by Jim Hovis. Did Astronomers actually find an earth-like planet out there that could support life? (Rejected)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Earth-like-planet-out-there.doc">Earth-like planet out there</a>  (Format is Office-2000 WORD *.doc.)  Reviewed by Jim Hovis. Did Astronomers actually find an earth-like planet out there that could support life? (<span style="color: #ff0000;">Rejected</span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-news-media-earth-like-planet-found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Critique, Detroit Free Press on Evolution</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-critique-detroit-free-press-on-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-critique-detroit-free-press-on-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worldviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BIGBNG1 WORD format (*.doc)  A review of the Newspaper&#8217;s article on Big Bang and Cosmology Worldview from the Creationist&#8217;s Worldview. Reviewed by Jim Hovis, an update. (Article not approved)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/BIGBNG1.doc">BIGBNG1</a> WORD format (*.doc)  A review of the Newspaper&#8217;s article on Big Bang and Cosmology Worldview from the Creationist&#8217;s Worldview. Reviewed by Jim Hovis, an update. (<span style="color: #ff0000;">Article not approved</span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-critique-detroit-free-press-on-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Review: Cosmology today compared to 1993</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-cosmology-today-compared-to-1993/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-cosmology-today-compared-to-1993/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age of Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harrison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscillating Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Different Universe  WORD Format (*.doc)  A VERY DIFFERENT UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO Edward Harrison, as perceived in 1993.  Reviewed by Jim Hovis 2010;  (Sky and Telescope- Sept 1993)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Different-Universe.doc">Different Universe</a>  WORD Format (*.doc)  <strong>A VERY DIFFERENT UNIVERSE ACCORDING TO Edward Harrison, as perceived in 1993.  </strong><strong><em>Reviewed by Jim Hovis 2010; </em></strong> <span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">(Sky and Telescope- Sept 1993) </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/08/article-review-cosmology-today-compared-to-1993/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

