<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creation Science &#187; Hovis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creationsciencenm.org/tag/hovis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creationsciencenm.org</link>
	<description>Fellowship of New Mexico</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:29:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Reliability Engineering &amp; Second Law</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/01/reliability-engineering-second-law/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/01/reliability-engineering-second-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PowerPoint Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of Decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermodynamics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a PowerPoint Presentation of 1/17/2012 on the Engineering Discipline of the Science of Reliability as it relates to the fall of Adam and Eve and the operation of the world ever since. (see the related paper on Reliability and the Bible) Rel &#38; Bible CSFNM    Format is MS Powerpoint (*.pptx)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is a PowerPoint Presentation of 1/17/2012 on the Engineering Discipline of the Science of Reliability as it relates to the fall of Adam and Eve and the operation of the world ever since. (see the related paper on Reliability and the Bible)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Rel-Bible-CSFNM1.pptx">Rel &amp; Bible CSFNM</a><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Rel-Bible-CSFNM.pptx">    <span style="color: #000000;">Format is MS Powerpoint (*.pptx)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2012/01/reliability-engineering-second-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Scientist looks at the Universe</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypothesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[observational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Dawkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dawkins and purpose The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dawkins-and-purpose.docx">Dawkins and purpose <br /></a>The above file leads into the file below.  They both address the purpose and meaning to the Universe and the life that exists on the earth. (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)  Richard Dawkins says that if there is a God, he gives no meaning and purpose to the Universe. We at CSFNM say that everything that we look at has design, purpose and meaning.  If we don&#8217;t see it, it is not that it isn&#8217;t there; we simply lack knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Scientist-looks-at-Universe1.docx">Scientist looks at Universe</a> (File in MS Office-2007 format: *.docx)</p>
<p>A Scientist (and a Physicist/Mathematician) looks at the Universe and applies the Scientific Method and Logic to explain what we see all around us.  We see everything headed towards becoming cold, dark and dead.  Is there any scientific explanation for the Universe starting out Operational and then going dead?  (By Jim Hovis, scientist, engineer, educator, retired)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/08/a-scientist-looks-at-the-universe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video Review Report, Astronomy (Psarris)</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Origins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psarris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astronomy video (In MS Office-2007 document Format: *.docx) A review of the Spike Psarris video titled, &#8220;Astronomy, Our Created Solar System&#8221;.  Available through www.creationastronomy.com Produced in 2009 Creation Astronomy Media.  The video is a discussion of how the solar system formed according to the theory of evolution and compared to the actual characteristics of our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Astronomy-video1.docx">Astronomy video</a></p>
<p>(In MS Office-2007 document Format: *.docx) A review of the Spike Psarris video titled, &#8220;Astronomy, Our Created Solar System&#8221;.  Available through www.creationastronomy.com</p>
<p>Produced in 2009 Creation Astronomy Media.  The video is a discussion of how the solar system formed according to the theory of evolution and compared to the actual characteristics of our system. Reviewed by Jim Hovis (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/07/video-review-report-astronomy-psarris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two models of cosmology to consider</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clock rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galaxies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space-time continuum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed of light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stretching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fabric of space 2 models  MS WORD Format Office-2007 (*.docx) This is a discussion of two models of the cosmos and the implication of the &#8220;expanse&#8221; stretched out, particularly on the 4th Day of the Creation Week.  It asks questions about the speed of light and interpretations of Red Shift of light energy.  This paper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Fabric-of-space-2-models.docx">Fabric of space 2 models</a>  MS WORD Format Office-2007 (*.docx)</p>
<p>This is a discussion of two models of the cosmos and the implication of the &#8220;expanse&#8221; stretched out, particularly on the 4th Day of the Creation Week.  It asks questions about the speed of light and interpretations of Red Shift of light energy.  This paper is intended to stimulate thinking.  It uses the concept of clock rate differences throughout the Universe discussed by folks such as Russ Humphreys and John Harnett.  Keep in mind that models are just that and no more.  Jim Hovis, amateur astronomer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/two-models-of-cosmology-to-consider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article Review on Speed of Light</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Lisle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Shifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed of light]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Measuring speed of light in MS WORD Format (*.docx) Office-2007 A compilation by Jim Hovis on the subject of the speed of light in outer space and its effect on observations in distant space and photon wavelength red shift interpretation and the quantization principle.  Is the speed of light variant in different areas of space and/or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Measuring-speed-of-light1.docx">Measuring speed of light</a> in MS WORD Format (*.docx) Office-2007</p>
<p>A compilation by Jim Hovis on the subject of the speed of light in outer space and its effect on observations in distant space and photon wavelength red shift interpretation and the quantization principle.  Is the speed of light variant in different areas of space and/or near to massive objects in the heavens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2011/02/article-review-on-speed-of-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review, Genesis in Space and Time, Francis Schaeffer</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Godly Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schaeffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ungodly race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book Review Shaeffer Format is MS WORD, Office-2003 (*.doc) This is a review of Dr. Francis Schaeffer&#8217;s book, Genesis in Space and Time, IVP, 1972. This is a look at what Creation Science thinking was, leading up to 1972.  Dr. Schaeffer has a good grasp of what the implications of Science were in understanding the beginning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Shaeffer.docx">Book Review Shaeffer</a> Format is MS WORD, Office-2003 (*.doc) This is a review of Dr. Francis Schaeffer&#8217;s book, Genesis in Space and Time, IVP, 1972. This is a look at what Creation Science thinking was, leading up to 1972.  Dr. Schaeffer has a good grasp of what the implications of Science were in understanding the beginning of the Universe and mankind, including the events that lead to the Flood of Noah and related history.  (<em>Reviewed by Jim Hovis</em>. <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Approved</strong></span>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-genesis-in-space-and-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review, The God of Creation by Epp</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews/Creation Articles Critique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God of Creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Book Review Epp  Format is MS WORD (*.docx) Office-2007.  This is a book review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221; by Theodore Epp, 1972, and reviewed by Jim Hovis.  It is a detailed presentation of Genesis 1-11 and the implications on Creation Science and Christian viewpoints. (Approved)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Epp.docx">Book Review Epp</a>  Format is MS WORD (*.docx) Office-2007.  This is a book review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221; by Theodore Epp, 1972, and reviewed by Jim Hovis.  It is a detailed presentation of Genesis 1-11 and the implications on Creation Science and Christian viewpoints. (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/book-review-the-god-of-creation-by-epp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Articles on Nephilim, Gods, &amp; Giants</title>
		<link>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/</link>
		<comments>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CSF Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohabitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hovis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leupold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nephilim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sons of god]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creationsciencenm.org/?p=1245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Genesis 6  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003 Genesis 6  Format MS WORD (*.docx) Office -2007.  A discussion concerning Creation, conditions with man before the Flood of Noah, sons of God marrying the daughters of men, and who are the Nephilim? (By Jim Hovis) Genesis_6_paper_jenkins Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003 Genesis_6_paper_jenkins  Format MS WORD (*.docx) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis-61.doc">Genesis 6</a>  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis-63.docx">Genesis 6</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx) Office -2007.  A discussion concerning Creation, conditions with man before the Flood of Noah, sons of God marrying the daughters of men, and who are the Nephilim? (By Jim Hovis)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis_6_paper_jenkins.doc">Genesis_6_paper_jenkins</a> Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Genesis_6_paper_jenkins.docx">Genesis_6_paper_jenkins</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx) A student analysis paper addressing Genesis 6 and the sons of God and the Nephilim. (By Levi Jenkins)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Leupold.doc">Book Review Leupold</a> Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Leupold.docx">Book Review Leupold</a>  Format MS WORD (*.docx)  A Book Review of a work produced by Dr. Leupold in 1942. Discussion limited to Genesis 1 and 6; the Creation and the Sons of God and the Nephilim.  A good conservative view in late 19th Century and early 20th Century. (Reviewed by Jim Hovis-<span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>approved</strong></span>)</p>
<p><a href="http://creationsciencenm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Book-Review-Epp.doc">Book Review Epp</a>  Format MS WORD (*.doc) Office 2000, WORD-2003. A Book Review of &#8220;The God of Creation&#8221;, by Theodore Epp, 1972.  Discussion limited to Genesis 1 to 6 that covers Creation day 1-4 and the issue of Sons of God and the Nephilim. (Reviewd by Jim Hovis) (<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Approved</span></strong>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://creationsciencenm.org/2010/12/articles-on-nephilim-gods-giants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

